Replies to Garland, Ben-Ze'ev, Timmerman, and Beisecker

Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 4 (1):33-47 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I respond here to commentators’ concerns about the scope of grief, further clarifying the role of practical identity in those whose deaths we grieve; elaborating my understanding of grief as egocentric; defending my own resolution of the paradox of grief against alternative resolutions proposed by my commentators; and substantiating the role of self-knowledge in the self-regarding duty to grieve.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Grief’s Badness and the Paradox of Grief.Travis Timmerman - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 4 (1):18-26.
Grief and Self-Knowledge.Dave Beisecker - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 4 (1):27-33.
Replies to Timmerman and Gorman.John Martin Fischer - 2022 - The Journal of Ethics 26 (3):395-414.
Vicarious Grief, Mental Health, and the Duty to Grieve.C. Garland - 2022 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 4 (1):6-12.
Knowing Emotions: Replies to de Sousa, Beisecker, and Gallegos.Rick A. Furtak - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 1 (1):135-145.
Replies to Commentators.Hilary Putnam - 2006 - Contemporary Pragmatism 3 (2):67-98.
Replies to Commentators.Nuno Venturinha - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (5):1713-1724.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-02

Downloads
18 (#833,026)

6 months
4 (#790,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Cholbi
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Grieving Our Way Back to Meaningfulness.Michael Cholbi - 2021 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 90:235-251.

Add more references