Economics and the Good Life: Keynes and Schumacher

Economic Thought 2 (2):33 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is, I think, interesting to compare the views of E. F. Schumacher and J. M. Keynes on the ethical aspects of economics – both the economic systems of which they were a part and economics as a subject. Both agreed that economics (as commonly understood and taught) applied to only a limited sphere of life. They agreed about the role of profits, the market and the love of money. And they both believed that there was much more to life than getting and spending. For Keynes, economic activity was the means to bring society to a position where the good life could be enjoyed. Schumacher was even more ambitious: he thought economic activity should be made part of the good life.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-12

Downloads
33 (#473,160)

6 months
2 (#1,448,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Conception of Intrinsic Value.G. E. Moore - 1998 - In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Conception of Intrinsic Value.G. E. Moore - 1998 - In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references