Lies, Damned Lies, Science, and Theology: Why Everyone Needs to Know the Truth About Science and Religion

In Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss (eds.), Science and Religion in Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 227-238 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A deep concern for the pursuit of truth needs to underlie both the philosophy and the practice of education if we are to enable students to move beyond the widespread prevailing conflict model of the relationship between science and religion to a more nuanced understanding which better reflects the academic literature on the science and religion interface. This chapter will begin by illustrating the pervasiveness of the conflict caricature in popular culture, using examples from the Twittersphere, comedians, popular novels, films, and documentaries. It then argues that the lack of space in much current science education for engaging in any real depth with the history and philosophy of science has allowed students to persist in their belief in the conflict model. This does not do justice to the richness of the academic debate about the relationship between science and religion. The conflict model can be further reinforced in students by some approaches to religious education which effectively embrace an understanding that true knowledge is only properly defined through empirical science. In order to move beyond this persistent conflict model, we need a more holistic philosophy of education in which the pursuit of truth has a much more central position. This involves the interaction of multiple languages: scientific, mathematical, musical, poetic, artistic, philosophical, and theological. These languages are not directly translatable from one to another, nor are they reducible to a single basic language. But it is both possible and vital to relate them one to another. This relationship between science and other disciplines draws on the insight of Aquinas that religio and scientia are essentially virtues, mental habits which assist in the pursuit of truth rather than being objectivised intellectual systems. It can also be illustrated by trying to describe what it means to be human, using multiple different languages and exploring how they relate to one another in building up the fullest picture of reality and truth.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss - 2019 - In Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss (eds.), Science and Religion in Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 1-11.
Falsification and Belief: SCHUBERT M. OGDEN.Schubert M. Ogden - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (1):21-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references