Universal generalization and universal inter-item confusability

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):659-660 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that confusability between items should be distinguished from generalization between items. Shepard's data concern confusability, but the theories proposed by Shepard and by Tenenbaum & Griffiths concern generalization, indicating a gap between theory and data. We consider the empirical and theoretical work involved in bridging this gap. [Shepard; Tenenbaum & Griffiths].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Universal bayesian inference?David Dowe & Graham Oppy - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):662-663.
Exhuming similarity.Dedre Gentner - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):669-669.
Tribute to an ideal exemplar of scientist and person.Dominic W. Massaro - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):688-689.
Conceptual Spaces, Generalisation Probabilities and Perceptual Categorisation.Nina Poth - 2019 - In Peter Gärdenfors, Antti Hautamäki, Frank Zenker & Mauri Kaipainen (eds.), Conceptual Spaces: Elaborations and Applications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 7-28.
Generalization and Tinbergen's four whys.Ken Cheng - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):660-661.
What is the probability of the bayesian model, given the data?Evan Heit - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):672-673.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#369,536)

6 months
12 (#304,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Varieties of perceptual independence.F. Gregory Ashby & James T. Townsend - 1986 - Psychological Review 93 (2):154-179.

Add more references