- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
8. The Theory of Ideas
In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 177-198 (1986)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Chappell, Vere, ed. Descartes’s Meditations: Critical Essays. [REVIEW]Kurt Smith - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 53 (2):434-435.
7. Analysis in the Meditations: The Quest for Clear and Distinct Ideas.E. M. Curley - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 153-176.
Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell.Paul Hoffman, David Owen & Gideon Yaffe (eds.) - 2008 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
Essays on Descartes’ Meditations.Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.) - 1986 - University of California Press.
16. Confused and Obscure Ideas of Sense.Martha Bolton - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 389-404.
Symposium: Locke and the veil of perception guest editor: Vere Chappell - Comments.V. Chappell - unknown
11. Is There Radical Dissimulation in Descartes’ Meditations?Louis E. Loeb - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 243-270.
1. The Structure of Descartes’ Meditations.Amélie Oksenberg Rorty - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 1-20.
2. The Naive Narrator: Meditation in Descartes’ Meditations.L. Aryeh Kosman - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 21-44.
4. Semel in vita: The Scientific Background to Descartes’ Meditations.Daniel Garber - 1986 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 81-116.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-09
Downloads
12 (#317,170)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
2023-06-09
Downloads
12 (#317,170)
6 months
5 (#1,552,255)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Spinoza on the problem of akrasia.Eugene Marshall - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):41-59.
Ideas, pictures, and the directness of perception in Descartes and Locke.Lex Newman - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):134-154.
Descartes and the Aristotelian Framework of Sensory Perception1.Joseph W. Hwang - 2011 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (1):111-148.
Deducing false propositions from true ideas: Nieuwentijt on mathematical reasoning.Sylvia Pauw - 2020 - Synthese 197 (11):4927-4945.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo