On the Immorality of Lying to Children About Their Origins

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (2):22-33 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using the moral work on trust and lying, I argue that allowing or encouraging children to believe you are their biological parent when you are not is a breach of trust in the parent-child relationship. While other approaches focus on specific harms or the rights of the child, I make a virtue theory argument based on our understanding of trust, lies, and the nature of the parent-child relationship. Drawing heavily on Nancy Potter's virtue theory of trustworthiness, I consider the nature of trust in the parent-child relationship and what this means for being a trustworthy parent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Four Theories of Filial Duty.Simon Keller - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):254 - 274.
Make yer spuds and whatever. [REVIEW]Jean Kazez - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 53 (53):116-117.
The Right to Parent One's Biological Baby.Anca Gheaus - 2011 - Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (4):432-455.
Whither the “Offices of Nature”?: Kant and the Obligation to Love.Bernard G. Prusak - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:113-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-12

Downloads
53 (#300,920)

6 months
14 (#179,586)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sonya Charles
Cleveland State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references