Language and empiricism: after the Vienna Circle

New York: Palgrave-Macmillan (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book compares attitudes to empiricism in language study from mid-twentieth century philosophy of language and from present-day linguistics. It focuses on responses to the logical positivism of the Vienna Circle, particularly in the work of British philosopher J. L. Austin and the much less well-known work of Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arne Naess and Empirical Semantics.Siobhan Chapman - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):18-30.
Arne Naess — Dogmas and Problems of Empiricism.Friedrich Stadler - 2010 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 14:11-31.
Logical Syntax and the Application of Mathematics.Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau - 2011 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 15:323-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
9 (#1,268,194)

6 months
5 (#837,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Siobhan Chapman
University of Liverpool

Citations of this work

Arne Næss’s experiments in truth.Jamin Asay - 2024 - Erkenntnis 89 (2):545-566.
The experimental and the empirical: Arne Naess' statistical approach to philosophy.Siobhan Chapman - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (5):961-981.
Experimental Philosophy: 1935-1965.Taylor Murphy - 2014 - In Tania Lombrozo, Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Volume 1. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. vol. 1, pp. 325-368.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references