Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science

British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2):211-216 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/aesthj/ayr043

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. [REVIEW]Katerina Bantinaki - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):114 - 118.
Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science.Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.) - 2008 - Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Book review: R. Frigg & M. C. Hunter, eds. 2010. Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in art and science. Dordrecht: Springer. [REVIEW]Marion Vorms - unknown
Can we dispense with mimesis in representation?: R. Frigg and M. C. Hunter : Beyond mimesis and convention: Representation in art and science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, xxx + 265pp, €139,95 HB.José A. Díez - 2011 - Metascience 21 (1):105-110.
Fiction and scientific representation.Roman Frigg - 2008 - In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science. pp. 97-138.
Models: parables v fables.Nancy Cartwright - 2008 - In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Models as make-believe.Adam Toon - 2008 - In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Models: parables v fables.Nancy Cartwright - 2008 - In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Who is afraid of Mimesis? Contesting the Common Sense of Indian Aesthetics through the Theory of 'Mimesis' or Anukaraṇa Vâda.Parul Dave Mukherji - 2016 - In Arindam Chakrabarti (ed.), The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 71-92.
Art Beyond Representation: The Performative Power of the Image. [REVIEW]K. Bantinaki - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):213-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-23

Downloads
48 (#322,525)

6 months
2 (#1,446,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references