Reply to Critiques of Hippocrates’ Oath and Asclepius’ Snake

Philosophia 49 (3):933-940 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In what follows, I reply to critical appraisals of my book entitled Hippocrates’ Oath and Asclepius’ Snake: The Birth of the Medical Profession. Professors Tollefsen, McPherson, and Potts separately offer these thoughtful critiques. Professor Tollefsen approaches the work from the standpoint of the physician-patient relationship. Professors McPherson and Potts both address it in terms of virtues. Potts treats the theme of virtue generally while McPherson focuses on the virtue of piety. Since virtues attend relationships, in what follows, I discuss, first, the physician-patient relationship ; second, virtue generally ; and third, and finally, the virtue of piety specifically.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-14

Downloads
13 (#288,494)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Cavanaugh
University of San Francisco

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations