Chateaubriand's logicism

Manuscrito 27 (1):13-20 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his doctoral dissertation, O. Chateaubriand favored Dedekind’s analysis of the notion of number; whereas in Logical Forms, he favors a fregean approach to the topic. My aim in this paper is to examine the kind of logicism he defends. Three aspects will be considered: the concept of analysis; the universality of arithmetical properties and their definability; the irreducibility of arithmetical objects

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Russell: a guide for the perplexed.John Ongley & Rosalind Carey - 2013 - New York: Continuum. Edited by Rosalind Carey.
Russell’s reasons for logicism.Ian Proops - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
The Fruits of Logicism.Timothy Bays - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):415-421.
Logicism lite.Richard Jeffrey - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (3):474-496.
Logicism Revisited.Otávio Bueno - 2001 - Principia 5 (1-2):99-124.
Truth and proof.Otávio Bueno - 2008 - Manuscrito 31 (1):419-440.
C. S. Peirce: Pragmatism and Logicism.Jaime Nubiola - 1996 - Philosophia Scientiae 1 (2):109-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-12

Downloads
24 (#676,707)

6 months
2 (#1,255,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references