The Monist 66 (2):202-212 (1983)
AbstractInterpreting artworks involves “the overtone or implication of an obligation of a moral kind.” Here “moral” might be understood in two different ways. First, such obligation, like moral obligation, involves recognition of and submission to some law outside oneself. The law says “Do not kill” and so I intend my actions to conform with that standard; analogously, a performance presents that work created by the composer. Second, the act of interpretation may itself have moral value. Interpretation brings to life artworks which otherwise could not be as fully appreciated.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Platonism in Music: A Kind of Defense.Peter Kivy - 1983 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 19 (1):109-129.
Musical Materialism and the Inheritance Problem.Chris Tillman & J. Spencer - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):252-259.
Musical Works and Performances: A Philosophical Exploration.Stephen Davies - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Defending Musical Perdurantism.Ben Caplan & Carl Matheson - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):59-69.
Musical Works and Orchestral Colour.Stephen Davies - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (4):363-375.
Musical Formalism and Political Performances.Jonathan A. Neufeld - 2009 - Contemporary Aesthetics 7.
The Ontology of Musical Works and the Authenticity of Their Performances.Stephen Davies - 1991 - Noûs 25 (1):21-41.