Descriptivism, scope, and apparently empty names

Philosophical Studies 156 (2):283-288 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some descriptivists reply to the modal argument by appealing to scope ambiguities. In this paper, we argue that those replies don’t work in the case of apparently empty names like ‘Sherlock Holmes’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Epistemological Argument Against Descriptivism.Robin Jeshion - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):325-345.
Empty names.Ben Caplan - 2002 - Dissertation, Ucla
Millian descriptivism.Ben Caplan - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (2):181-198.
A Cognitive Theory of Empty Names.Eduardo García-Ramírez - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (4):785-807.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-26

Downloads
392 (#50,694)

6 months
23 (#118,888)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andy Cullison
DePauw University

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.

View all 24 references / Add more references