British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):113-134 (2004)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Can a musical work be created? Some say ‘no’. But, we argue, there is no handbook of universally accepted metaphysical truths that they can use to justify their answer. Others say ‘yes’. They have to find abstract objects that can plausibly be identified with musical works, show that abstract objects of this sort can be created, and show that such abstract objects can persist. But, we argue, none of the standard views about what a musical work is allows musical works both to be created and to persist.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/bjaesthetics/44.2.113 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Why Can’T I Change Bruckner’s Eighth Symphony?David Friedell - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (3):805-824.
Relativity and the Causal Efficacy of Abstract Objects.Tim Juvshik - 2020 - American Philosophical Quarterly 57 (3).
Repeatable Artworks as Created Types.Lee Walters - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (4):461-477.
View all 34 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Defending Musical Perdurantism.Ben Caplan & Carl Matheson - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):59-69.
There Are No Things That Are Musical Works.Ross P. Cameron - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (3):295-314.
Constitution and Qua Objects in the Ontology of Music.Simon J. Evnine - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (3):203-217.
Against Musical Works as Eternal Types.Saam Trivedi - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):73-82.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
831 ( #8,607 of 2,519,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,506 of 2,519,807 )
2009-01-28
Total views
831 ( #8,607 of 2,519,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,506 of 2,519,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads