Why ritual works: A rejection of the by-product hypothesis

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):614 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that ritual is not a by-product as Boyer & Lienard (B&L) claim, but rather an evolved adaptation for social communication that facilitates non-agonistic social interactions among non-kin. We review the neurophysiological effects of ritual and propose neural structures and networks beyond the cortical-striato-pallidal-thalamic circuit (CSPT) likely to be implicated in ritual. The adaptationist approach to ritual offers a more parsimonious model for understanding these effects as well as the findings B&L present. (Published Online February 8 2007).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ritual pathology and the nature of ritual culture.Merker Bjorn - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):624-625.
Multicultural religious and spiritual rituals: Meaning and praxis.H. Hageman Joan - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):619-620.
The rituals of explanation.Foss Jeffrey - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):618-619.
Ritual: Meaningful or meaningless?Robert Turner - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):633-633.
Uncertainty and rituals.Erik Z. Woody & Henry Szechtman - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):634-635.
Money as civilizing ritual.Russell Belk - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):180-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
7 (#603,698)

6 months
34 (#455,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references