The general/special distinction in criminal law, tort law and legal theory

Law and Philosophy 26 (5):465-500 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10982-007-9008-4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The science veil over tort law policy: How should scientific evidence be utilized in toxic tort law? [REVIEW]Carl F. Cranor - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 24 (2):139 - 210.
Modeling Criminal Law.Ronald J. Allen - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (4):469-481.
A Case for Criminal Negligence.Andrew D. Leipold - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (4):455-468.
Naturalized Jurisprudence and American Legal Realism Revisited.Brian Leiter - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (4):499-516.
The Stoics and Legal Conservatives: Strange Bedfellows or Just Strange Fellows? [REVIEW]Jesse Merriam - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (2):201-251.
Democracy and restraint.Steven Wall - 2006 - Law and Philosophy 26 (3):307-342.
Forced assistance.Gerhard Øverland - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (2):203 - 232.
Book review. [REVIEW]Susan J. Brison - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (1):97-104.
Emotional excuses.Suzanne Uniacke - 2007 - Law and Philosophy 26 (1):95-117.
Book Review. [REVIEW]Susan J. Brison - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (1):97-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
62 (#82,546)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references