The implications of Koehler's approach for fact finding

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):18-18 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Koehler's work will assist the effort to understand legal fact finding. It leaves two questions somewhat open: (i) the extent to which empirical research can measure correctness of fact-finding, a function that involves the resolution of normative questions and (ii) the standards judges should use in the absence of the research he advocates.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explanatory coherence and fact-finding.Craig R. Callen - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):739-740.
International Norms in Human Rights Fact-Finding.Diane Orentlicher - 2015 - In Philip Alston & Sarah Knuckey (eds.), The Transformation of Human Rights Fact-Finding. Oxford University Press USA.
The Transformation of Human Rights Fact-Finding.Philip Alston & Sarah Knuckey - 2015 - In Philip Alston & Sarah Knuckey (eds.), The Transformation of Human Rights Fact-Finding. Oxford University Press USA.
The Danger of a Single Story.Shreya Atrey - 2015 - In Philip Alston & Sarah Knuckey (eds.), The Transformation of Human Rights Fact-Finding. Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
28 (#557,911)

6 months
12 (#304,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
A treatise on probability.John Maynard Keynes - 1921 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.

View all 56 references / Add more references