Bonjour's Positions on Empirical Knowledge: From Coherentism to Foundationalism

Abstract

Lawrence Bonjour supported coherentism in the early period, but turns to foundationalism in the later period. In this paper I shall focus on two sides in relation to his epistemology. To understand his early and later positions, first, I shall explain his coherentism and foundationalism. Second, I shall consider what objections have been raised to each position. Thus we can evaluate why Bonjour abandoned his coherentism and why his foundationalism succeeds as a plausible theory for empirical justification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Prodigal Epistemology: Coherence, Holism, and the Sellarsian Tradition.Matthew Burstein - 2007 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 92:197-216.
The Dialectic of Foundationalism and Coherentism.Laurence BonJour - 1999 - In John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Malden, Ma: Blackwell. pp. 117-144.
Probability and Coherence Justification.Michael Huemer - 1997 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):463-472.
The Elements of Coherentism.Laurence BonJour - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
The epistemology of perception.Daniel OBrien - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-03

Downloads
17 (#866,557)

6 months
7 (#425,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references