Five Theses on De Re States and Attitudes

In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), The philosophy of David Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 246--324 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I shall propose five theses on de re states and attitudes. To be a de re state or attitude is to bear a peculiarly direct epistemic and representational relation to a particular referent in perception or thought. I will not dress this bare statement here. The fifth thesis tries to be less coarse. The first four explicate and restrict context- bound, singular, empirical representation, which constitutes a significant and central type of de re state or attitude.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Five theses on De Re States and attitudes.Tyler Burge - 2010 - In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), The philosophy of David Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press.
Attitudes and Objects.Alan Hoc Thwaits - 1988 - Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
Counterfactual Attitudes and Multi-Centered Worlds.Dilip Ninan - 2012 - Semantics and Pragmatics 5 (5):1-57.
Singular thoughts and de re attitude reports.James Openshaw - 2018 - Mind and Language 33 (4):415-437.
Between de dicto and de re: De objecto attitudes.Manuel Rebuschi & Tero Tulenheimo - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):828-838.
Attitudes and their attributions.Manidipa Sen - 1996 - Dissertation, St. Andrews

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-15

Downloads
338 (#62,468)

6 months
17 (#204,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tyler Burge
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

Disjunctivism again.Tyler Burge - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (1):43-80.
A Defence of Intentionalism about Demonstratives.Alex Radulescu - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4): 775-791.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description.Bertrand Russell - 1911 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11:108--28.
Quantifiers and propositional attitudes.Willard van Orman Quine - 1955 - Journal of Philosophy 53 (5):177-187.
Quantifying in.David Kaplan - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):178-214.
Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description.Bertrand Russell - 1917 - In Mysticism and logic. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. pp. 152-167.

View all 10 references / Add more references