Innate cognitive capacities: the poverty of the stimulus argument vs. the curry argument

The Humanities and Social Studies in the Far East 17 (3):99-103 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the popular argument among nativists, who use it against the empiricist approach. We analyze the strongest objection against the poverty of the stimulus argument which is the curry argument. As a result of the critical consideration of the poverty of the stimulus discussion, we conclude that the curry argument is quite sound.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The poverty of the stimulus argument.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
Contemporary Concept Nativism: Some Methodological Remarks.Ilya Y. Bulov - 2019 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (7):96-109.
In defense of nativism.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):693-718.
What's Within: Nativism Reconsidered. [REVIEW]Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 9:242-247.
Cowie on the poverty of stimulus.John Collins - 2003 - Synthese 136 (2):159-190.
On the argument from the poverty of the stimulus.Ken Wexler - 1991 - In Aka Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn. Blackwell. pp. 252--273.
Introduction.Tom Simpson, Stephen Stich, Peter Carruthers & Stephen Laurence - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-18

Downloads
179 (#20,903)

6 months
111 (#156,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?