Is a Scientific Assessment of Risk Possible? Value Assumptions in the Canadian Alachlor Controversy

Dialogue 30 (3):235- (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Increasingly our society relies upon government regulatory agencies to protect its people, its institutions and its environment from the negative impacts of new technologies. These agencies are saddled with the task of deciding among strongly conflicting viewpoints represented by a wide range of interest groups and “value communities” within the society. When regulatory decisions are made some interests and values are protected while others are curtailed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Value assumptions in risk assessment: A case study of the alachlor controversy. [REVIEW]Hugh Lehman - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1):110-112.
Toward understanding aspects of the precautionary principle.Carl F. Cranor - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):259 – 279.
The Myth of Scientific Incompetence of Regulatory Agencies.Ted Greenwood - 1984 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 9 (1):83-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
33 (#125,351)

6 months
22 (#694,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Larry Haworth
University of Waterloo

References found in this work

Science and trans-science.Alvin M. Weinberg - 1972 - Minerva 10 (2):209-222.

Add more references