A Short Note on the Scientific Attitude, the Religious Attitude and the Surrational

Dialogo 3 (1):345-350 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We explain that the scientific attitude, with a “good understanding” of what is science, might be the most genuinely religious attitude, and that in fact, religion and science are much closer than what we are usually told. Nevertheless they cannot be identified effectively in any terrestrial applications without leading to inconsistency, but are truly, and thus non effectively, identical in the ever guessed true realm.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A model of dual attitudes.Timothy D. Wilson, Samuel Lindsey & Tonya Y. Schooler - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (1):101-126.
Three Religious Attitudes.Steven G. Smith - 1998 - Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):3-24.
The scientific attitude.Frederick Grinnell - 1987 - Boulder: Westview Press.
Wittgenstein and the ’Factorization Model’ of Religious Belief.Genia Schönbaumsfeld - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (1):93--110.
When and why is it disrespectful to excuse an attitude?John W. Robison - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2391-2409.
How natural can ontology be?Sharon L. Crasnow - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):114-132.
Semantics for propositional attitude ascriptions.Graham Oppy - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 67 (1):1 - 18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-06

Downloads
1 (#1,902,042)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references