Troubles with exaptationism

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):510-511 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are two kinds of useful traits: adaptations, and all the others. Exaptations are just all the others. Exaptations are not for anything. Because there is such diversity in all the others, exaptation is not an explanatory concept. Its only real use is to block adaptationist excesses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lack of evidentiary criteria for exaptations?James L. Dannemiller - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):512-513.
Why specific design is not the mark of the adaptational.Jerome C. Wakefield - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):532-533.
Musings on the concept of exaptation and “creationism”.Charles Crawford - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):511-512.
Troubles with trivialism.Otávio Bueno - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):655 – 667.
Causal Troubles.Robert Titiev - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:281-286.
Chasing Chimeras.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):635-646.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#578,323)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references