The Secret in the Information Society

Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):293-305 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Who can still keep a secret in a world in which everyone and everything are connected by technology aimed at charting and cross-referencing people, objects, movements, behaviour, relationships, tastes and preferences? The possibilities to keep a secret have come under severe pressure in the information age. That goes for the individual as well as the state. This development merits attention as secrecy is foundational for individual freedom as well as essential to the functioning of the state. Building on Simmel’s work on secrecy, this paper argues that the individual’s secrets should be saved from the ever-expanding digital transparency. The legitimate function of state secrecy in turn needs rescuing from a culture of secrecy and over-classification that has exploded in recent years. Contrary to popular expectation, the digital revolution adds another layer of secrecy that is increasingly hidden behind the facade of the ‘big usable systems’ we work and play with every day. Our dependence on information systems and their black-boxed algorithmic analytical core leads to a certain degree of Weberian enchantment that may increase the disconnect between the system, user and object.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Secrecy in three acts.Peter Galison - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (3):941-974.
Logics of Political Secrecy.Eva Horn - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (7-8):103-122.
Secreto, lenguaje y memoria en la sociedad de la información.Rafael Capurro & Raquel Capurro - 2012 - International Review of Information Ethics 17:3-14.
The promise of ethical secrecy: can curiosity overcome automated group-think?Juliet Lodge - 2012 - International Review of Information Ethics 17:31-36.
The Dimensionality of Government Budget Information Opening.Jian-ren Li - 2010 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:40-47.
Secrecy and national security whistleblowing.Daniel Ellsberg - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (3):773-804.
Le Secret.Philippe Dujardin - 1987 - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Pulcinella secrets.Emilio Mordini - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (9):ii-iii.
Managerial secrecy: An ethical examination. [REVIEW]Victor Pompa - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):147 - 156.
Off the Record.Dave Boothroyd - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (7-8):41-59.
The Maker of Lies: Simmel, Mendacity and the Economy of Faith.Charles Barbour - 2012 - Theory, Culture and Society 29 (7-8):218-236.
The Inverse Relationship between Secrecy and Privacy.Julie E. Cohen - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (3):883-898.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-15

Downloads
31 (#515,838)

6 months
6 (#520,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Was Snowden virtuous?Clive Harfield - 2021 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):373-383.
Staying with the Secret: The Public Sphere in Platform Society.Timon Beyes - 2022 - Theory, Culture and Society 39 (4):111-127.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The taming of chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences.Geoffrey C. Bowker & Susan Leigh Star - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (1):212-214.
Secrets: on the ethics of concealment and revelation.Sissela Bok - 1982 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Logics of Political Secrecy.Eva Horn - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (7-8):103-122.

View all 9 references / Add more references