Critical Inquiry 17 (4):875-877 (1991)

Abstract
I suppose I should be grateful to Charles Bernheimer for setting me back on the path of righteousness from which I appear to have so grievously strayed. But I think Bernheimer and I are in deep disagreement about the purposes of literary criticism, and this may make me, in his perspective, a hopeless case. Bernheimer reads my article, “Storied Bodies, or Nana at Last Unveil’d,” as intending “to empower women by putting their sexuality at the generative origin of story” . He ascribes to me the motive of “offering feminists a gift” . He even suggests, in a particularly offensive move: “This offer, I would guess, provides the generative energy for Brooks’s critical story” . I can do without such attributions of motive. My intent, far less ambitious, was to describe some attitudes toward the nude female body that I found in novels and paintings of the later nineteenth century. I don’t believe that criticism need be harnessed to the “empowerment” of anyone in particular, nor that it need denounce what Bernheimer identifies as “patriarchal oppression” , “misogynist strategies” , and the “hegemonic privileges” of the male gaze everywhere they are to be found . Does criticism really need to burden itself with this litany of clichés? Do they tell us anything new? Peter Brooks is Tripp Professor of Humanities and director of the Whitney Humanities Center, Yale University. He is nearing completion of a book tentatively entitled Storied Bodies
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/448617
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Response to Peter Brooks.Charles Bernheimer - 1991 - Critical Inquiry 17 (4):868-874.
Art: A Bryn Mawr Symposium.Richard Bernheimer (ed.) - 1940 - New York: Oriole Editions.
[Hypotheses of Space and Time: A Response to Kant] Appendix No. 2.Charles S. Peirce & André De Tienne - 1993 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (4):637-673.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-17

Total views
11 ( #851,892 of 2,505,141 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,141 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes