Postscript: The prejudice against frameworks

Psychological Review 114 (4):1115-1115 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.1115

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Insights from studying prejudice in the context of American atheists.Eric P. Charles, Nicholas J. Rowland, Brooke Long & Fritz Yarrison - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):429-430.
At the Centre of Kierkegaard: An objective absurdity.E. D. L. Miller - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (4):433-441.
Le discours scientifique comme porteur de préjugés?Alain Goldschläger, Clive Thomson & Yzabelle Martineau (eds.) - 1998 - London, Ont.: Mestengo Press.
How not to accuse someone of prejudice.Emrys Westacott - 2015 - Think 14 (41):21-29.
Prejudice is about politics: A collective action perspective.John Drury - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):430-431.
The epistemology of the Postscript.M. G. Piety - 2010 - In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
The Model of Social Facts.Benjamin C. Zipursky - 2001 - In Jules L. Coleman (ed.), Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to `the Concept of Law'. Oxford University Press.
Normative (or Ethical) Positivism.Jeremy Waldron - 2001 - In Jules L. Coleman (ed.), Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to `the Concept of Law'. Oxford University Press.
All about us, but never about us: The three-pronged potency of prejudice.S. Alexander Haslam & Katherine J. Reynolds - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):435-436.
Law's Claim of Legitimate Authority.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2001 - In Jules L. Coleman (ed.), Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to `the Concept of Law'. Oxford University Press.
Humor and irony in the Postscript.John Lippitt - 2010 - In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
The "Socratic secret": the postscript to the Philosophical crumbs.M. Jamie Ferreira - 2010 - In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Legal Realism, Hard Positivism, and Limits of Conceptual Analysis.Brian Leiter - 2001 - In Jules L. Coleman (ed.), Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to `the Concept of Law'. Oxford University Press.
A defence of prejudice.John Grier Hibben - 1911 - Freeport, N.Y.,: Books for Libraries Press.
What works to address prejudice? Look to developmental science research for the answer.Melanie Killen, Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Aline Hitti & Adam Rutland - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):439.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
9 (#1,257,418)

6 months
1 (#1,475,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references