- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of Steven J. Brams and Alan D. Taylor: Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution [Book Review]
Ethics 108 (1):213-215 (1997)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution.Steven J. Brams & Alan D. Taylor - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Fair Division, From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution, Steven J. Brams and Alan D. Taylor , 272 pp., $18.95 paper, $59.95 cloth. [REVIEW]Marek M. Kaminski - 1997 - Ethics and International Affairs 11:330-331.
Two applications of a theorem of Dvoretsky, Wald, and Wolfovitz to cake division.Julius B. Barbanel & William S. Zwicker - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (2):203-207.
Legitimacy and the virtualization of dispute resolution.Laurens Mommers - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):207-232.
Fair division, Steven Brams and Alan Taylor. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 272 + xiv pages.Ariel Rubinstein - 1997 - Economics and Philosophy 13 (1):113.
Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution.Douglas Walton & David M. Godden - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.
Fair division of indivisible items.Steven J. Brams, Paul H. Edelman & Peter C. Fishburn - 2003 - Theory and Decision 55 (2):147-180.
The appropriate role of dispute resolution in building trust online.Colin Rule & Larry Friedberg - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):193-205.
Divide the Dollar: Three solutions and extensions. [REVIEW]Steven J. Brams & Alan D. Taylor - 1994 - Theory and Decision 37 (2):211-231.
Dispute resolution.Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Argument and alternative dispute resolution systems.Gregg B. Walker & Steven E. Daniels - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):693-704.
The Application of Critical Discourse Analysis in Environmental Dispute Resolution.Paul M. Smith1 - 2006 - Ethics, Place and Environment 9 (1):79-100.
Online Dispute Resolution in Consumer Disputes.Feliksas Petrauskas & Eglė Kybartienė - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (3):921-941.
Paradoxes of Fair Division.Steven J. Brams, Paul H. Edelman & Peter C. Fishburn - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (6):300.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
36 (#441,393)
6 months
7 (#420,337)
2010-08-24
Downloads
36 (#441,393)
6 months
7 (#420,337)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Implementing equal division with an ultimatum threat.Esat Doruk Cetemen & Emin Karagözoğlu - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (2):223-236.
Distributing Indivisible Goods Fairly: Evidence from a Questionnaire Study.Dorothea K. Herreiner & Clemens Puppe - 2007 - Analyse & Kritik 29 (2):235-258.
The Social Ontology of Deliberating Bodies.Philippe Urfalino - 2017 - Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (4):387-410.
Developing negotiation decision support systems that support mediators: A case study of the family_winner system. [REVIEW]Emilia Bellucci & John Zeleznikow - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):233-271.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo