A calculus of individuals based on "connection"

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (3):204-218 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although Aristotle (Metaphysics, Book IV, Chapter 2) was perhaps the first person to consider the part-whole relationship to be a proper subject matter for philosophic inquiry, the Polish logician Stanislow Lesniewski [15] is generally given credit for the first formal treatment of the subject matter in his Mereology.1 Woodger [30] and Tarski [24] made use of a specific adaptation of Lesniewski's work as a basis for a formal theory of physical things and their parts. The term 'calculus of individuals' was introduced by Leonard and Goodman [14] in their presentation of a system very similar to Tarski's adaptation of Lesniewski's Mereology. Contemporaneously with Lesniewski's development of his Mereology, Whitehead [27] and [28] was developing a theory of extensive abstraction based on the two-place predicate, 'x extends over y\ which is the converse of 'x is a part of y\ This system, according to Russell [22], was to have been the fourth volume of their Pήncipia Mathematica, the never-published volume on geometry. Both Lesniewski [15] and Tarski [25] have recognized the similarities between Whitehead's early work and Lesniewski's Mereology. Between the publication of Whitehead's early work and the publication of Process and Reality [29], Theodore de Laguna [7] published a suggestive alternative basis for Whitehead's theory. This led Whitehead, in Process and Reality, to publish a revised form of his theory based on the two-place predicate, 'x is extensionally connected with y\ It is the purpose of this paper to present a calculus of individuals based on this new Whiteheadian primitive predicate

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,053

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Słupecki's Generalized Mereology and Its Flaws.Rafal Urbaniak - 2014 - History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (3):289-300.
Lesniewski's Early Liar, Tarski and Natural Language.Arianna Betti - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 127 (1-3):267-287.
Part Configuration and Mereologies.Scott Richard Leslie - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, Riverside
Leśniewski and Mereology.Peter Simons - 2018 - In Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska & Ángel Garrido (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School. Past and Present. Cham, Switzerland: Springer- Birkhauser,. pp. 337-359.
Two results in Leśniewski's mereology.Robert E. Clay - 1973 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (4):559-564.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
118 (#179,313)

6 months
20 (#138,736)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The fundamental: Ungrounded or all-grounding?Stephan Leuenberger - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2647-2669.
Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries.Barry Smith & Achille C. Varzi - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):401-420.
Mereotopology: A theory of parts and boundaries.Barry Smith - 1996 - Data and Knowledge Engineering 20 (3):287–303.

View all 61 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references