The contingency of the laws of nature

Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co.. Edited by Fred Rothwell (1916)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arguments for incompatibilism.Kadri Vihvelin - 2003/2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Are we free to obey the laws?Randolph Clarke - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):389-401.
Leibniz's Optics and Contingency in Nature.Jeffrey K. McDonough - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (4):432-455.
Humean compatibilism.Helen Beebee & Alfred Mele - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):201-223.
Laws of nature.Norman Swartz - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
The Argument from Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
Mesta Panta Semeion. Plotinus, Leibniz and Berkeley on Determinism.Daniele Bertini - 2009 - In Panayiota Vassilopoulou & Stephen R. L. Clark (eds.), Late antique epistemology: other ways to truth. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
35 (#454,663)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Nineteenth-Century Atomic Debates and the Dilemma of an 'Indifferent Hypothesis'.Mary Jo Nye - 1976 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (3):245.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references