Comment on Montesquieu's Posthumous works. Milano: Bompiani, 2017, 2668 pp [Book Review]

Araucaria 22 (43):561-566 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At first glance a work focused on Posthumous works of Montesquieu might seem to be an old fashioned pursuit. Philosophy has come widely under attack from various viewpoints, throughout the world. Moreover, this dominant perspective seems to become always more natural for one part of the population in some countries. For instance, we think about the statements of the president of Brazil Jair Bolsonaro and his policy of cuts in the funding for universities; we have in mind the articles of the financial journalist Stefano Feltri whereby Philosophy would be useless2 or certain declarations of the Italian Minister of Interior Matteo Salvini3. In 2015, the Minister Hakuban Shimomura encouraged an anti-humanistic policy in Japan4. Fortunately, there are also exceptions like the president of Ireland Michael D. Higgins who recently drew attention to the importance of Philosophy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Montesquieu and His Legacy.Rebecca Kingston (ed.) - 2009 - State University of New York Press.
Dead Wrong: The Ethics of Posthumous Harm.David Boonin - 2019 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-09

Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references