Ideal Speech Conditions, Modern Discourse and Education

Journal of Philosophy of Education 29 (3):355-367 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Habermas’s educational importance is usually misconstrued or underestimated, partly because the scope and implications of ideal speech conditions are generally misunderstood. These conditions are only relevant to discursive speech situations, but non-manipulative teaching need not be discursive. And not even discursive teaching is an appropriate occasion for ideal speech conditions. They properly apply to discourse institutions, at the ‘epistemic centre of modernity’. Thus, the concept of ideal speech conditions impinges on the relation of school to higher education and on curricular change as an agency of modernisation, and illuminates the need for access to discourse institutions, if personal autonomy is an aim for school children, students or adults. Neo-Marxists, traditionalists and progressives all misunderstand the importance of discourse institutions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideal speech conditions, modern discourse and education.Nigel Blake - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 29 (3):355–367.
Ethical Agency in Modernity.Nancy Ruth Crocker - 1991 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Freedom of speech and philosophy of education.Roy Harris - 2009 - British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (2):111-126.
Idealized Non-ideal Justice Theory in Law of Peoples.Hye-Ryoung Kang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 25:37-44.
The discourse of control.Stephen Maguire - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):109-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-23

Downloads
10 (#1,172,872)

6 months
5 (#633,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reflectivity, Reflection, and Counter-Education.Ilan Gu-Ze'ev, Jan Masschelein & Nigel Blake - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (2):93-106.
The democracy we need: Situation, post-foundationalism and enlightenment.Nigel Blake - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 30 (2):215–238.
The Democracy We Need: Situation, Post-Foundationalism and Enlightenment.Nigel Blake - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 30 (2):215-238.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Habermas and Modernity.Richard J. Bernstein - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 176 (1):132-132.
Modernity and the problem of cultural pluralism.Nigel Blake - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 26 (1):39–50.
Modernity and the Problem of Cultural Pluralism.Nigel Blake - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 26 (1):39-50.

Add more references