Art as Microcosm

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 5 (10):305-363 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Roger E. Bissell offers a new interpretation and clarification of Rand's definition of art, maintaining that an artwork, like language, functions as a "tool of cognition," and that it does so more specifically as a special kind of microcosm which presents an imaginary world. In particular, he argues that architecture and music are aesthetic microcosms and tools of cognition that re-create reality and embody fundamental abstractions and, thus, contrary to assertions by certain Objectivist writers, are forms of art consistent with Rand's definition and concept.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Music and perceptual cognition.Roger E. Bissell - 1999 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (1):59 - 86.
A Neglected Source for Rand's Aesthetics. [REVIEW]Roger E. Bissell - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):187 - 204.
Art: What a Concept.John Enright - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):341 - 359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ayn Rand.Roderick Long & Neera K. Badhwar - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Future of Art Criticism: Objectivism Goes to the Movies.Kyle Barrowman - 2018 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 18 (2):165-228.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references