On the Viability of Galilean Relationalism

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (4):1183-1204 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT I explore the viability of a Galilean relational theory of space-time—a theory that includes a three-place collinearity relation among its stock of basic relations. Two formal results are established. First, I prove the existence of a class of dynamically possible models of Newtonian mechanics in which collinearity is uninstantiated. Second, I prove that the dynamical properties of Newtonian systems fail to supervene on their Galilean relations. On the basis of these two results, I argue that Galilean relational space-time is too weak of a structure to support a relational interpretation of classical mechanics. 1.Introduction 2.Completeness 3.Leibnizian Relationalism 4.Galilean Relationalism 5.Inverse-Cube Force Laws 5.1Warm-up 5.2Model 1: Zero angular momentum 5.3Model 2: Non-zero angular momentum 6.Supervenience 7.Incompleteness 8.Conclusion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Classical mechanics in Galilean space-time.Ray E. Artz - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (9-10):679-697.
A Connection between Minkowski and Galilean Space‐times in Quantum Mechanics.Douglas Kutach - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):15 – 29.
Relativity, God, and Time.Thomas Greenlee - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 85--92.
Aspects of objectivity in quantum mechanics.Harvey R. Brown - 1999 - In Jeremy Butterfield & Constantine Pagonis (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 45--70.
Representations and the Galilean Strategy.Laura Saller - 2009 - Conceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 38 (94):73-90.
Quantum mechanics in Galilean space-time.Ray E. Artz - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (11-12):839-862.
Relationalism rehabilitated? I: Classical mechanics.Oliver Pooley & Harvey R. Brown - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):183--204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-19

Downloads
75 (#220,163)

6 months
23 (#119,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Binkoski
Dartmouth College

Citations of this work

Geometry, Fields, and Spacetime.James Binkoski - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (4):1097-1117.
A Constructivist View of Newton’s Mechanics.H. G. Solari & M. A. Natiello - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (2):307-341.

Add more citations