Active dissection of privacy policies

&
Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 46 (4):5-11 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When teaching about privacy, the worst thing that could happen is for an entire audience to have never read a privacy policy. Forcing people to read a privacy policy is a passive activity that provides no retention of the material. This paper presents a means to actively engage users in the dissection of a privacy policy via content analysis.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1145/3040489.3040491

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

“I Didn’t Feel Right About Animal Dissection”: Dissection Objectors Share Their Science Class Experiences.Jan Oakley - 2013 - Society and Animals 21 (4):360-378.
A dynamic logic for privacy compliance.Guillaume Aucher, Guido Boella & Leendert Torre - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):187-231.
A Typology of Communicative Strategies in Online Privacy Policies: Ethics, Power and Informed Consent.Irene Pollach - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):221-235.
Philosophical theories of privacy: Implications for an adequate online privacy policy.Herman T. Tavani - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (1):1–22.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
A software platform to analyse the ethical issues of electronic patient privacy policy: the S3P example.M. A. Mizani & N. Baykal - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12):695-698.
New Ways of Thinking about Privacy.B. Roessler - 2006 - In Anne Philips Bonnie Honig & John Dryzek (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 694-713.
Users or Students? Privacy in University MOOCS.Meg Leta Jones & Lucas Regner - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1473-1496.
A pragmatic approach to privacy risk optimization: privacy by design for business practices. [REVIEW]Terry McQuay & Ann Cavoukian - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):379-396.
Privacy and the Right to Privacy.H. J. McCloskey - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (211):17 - 38.
The Epistemic Account of Privacy.Martijn Blaauw - 2013 - Episteme 10 (2):167-177.
Frog and Cyberfrog are Friends: Dissection Simulation and Animal Advocacy.Kenneth Fleischmann - 2003 - Society and Animals 11 (2):123-143.
A Phenomenological Defense of Computer-Simulated Frog Dissection.Robert Rosenberger - 2011 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (3):215-228.
We should not allow dissection of animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.
Katharine Park, Secrets de femmes. Le genre, la dissection et les origines de la dissection humaine.Laurence Moulinier-Brogi - 2012 - Clio 35:01-01.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
13 (#1,042,023)

6 months
4 (#798,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references