Korsgaard v. Gewirth on Universalization: Why Gewirthians are Kantians and Kantians Ought to be Gewirthians

Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (5):573-597 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Early Heidegger's Concept of History in Light of the Neo-Kantians.Ingo Farin - 2009 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (4):355-384.
Russell and the neo-Kantians.Jarmo Pulkkinen - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (1):99-117.
Scottish Kantians: An Exploration.J. H. Burns - 2009 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (2):115-131.
Two Concepts of Intrinsic Value.Ben Bradley - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):111-130.
Agency and responsibility.Fritz J. McDonald - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (2):199-207.
Reid on the Autonomy of Ethics: From Active Power to Moral Nonnaturalism.Terence Cuneo & Randall Harp - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (4):523-541.
Kant's Self-Legislation Procedure Reconsidered.Adrian M. S. Piper - 2012 - Kant Studies Online 2012 (1):203-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-11

Downloads
18 (#828,105)

6 months
9 (#300,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Deryck Beyleveld
Utrecht University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references