Reforming the “Reformed” Objection to Natural Theology

Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):189-206 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I offer a critique of Alvin Plantinga’s well known and widely accepted contention that his “Reformed” objection to natural theology can plausibly be said to derive from the writings of John Calvin and traditional Reformed theologians generally. I argue that although there is indeed a traditional Reformed objection to natural theology, Plantinga’s own objection is very different from and, in fact, incompatible with, it. I conclude that whatever the merits of Plantinga’s own position, it should not be confounded with that of Calvin or the Reformed tradition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
96 (#180,281)

6 months
6 (#526,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Beversluis
California State University, Fresno

Citations of this work

John Calvin, the sensus divinitatis, and the noetic effects of sin.Paul Helm - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (2):87-107.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references