Why Physicalists Needn't Bother with Perry's Recent Response to the Knowledge Argument

Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):135-148 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00384283

DOI

10.1111/j.2041-6962.2004.tb00993.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why Physicalists Needn’t Bother with Perry’s Recent Response to the Knowledge Argument.Jason Berntsen - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):135-148.
Recognitional Identification and the Knowledge Argument.Erhan Demircioglu - 2015 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):325-340.
There are no phenomenal concepts.Derek Ball - 2009 - Mind 118 (472):935-962.
Perry and Mary: Review of John Perry's knowledge, possibility, and consciousness. [REVIEW]Yujin Nagasawa - unknown
Papineau on Phenomenal Concepts. [REVIEW]Tim Crane - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):155-162.
Phenomenal Ways of Thinking.Luca Malatesti - 2008 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):149-166.
The Zombie Attack, Perry’s Parry, and a Riposte: A Slight Softening of the “Hard Problem” of Consciousness.J. Brendan Ritchie - 2017 - Topoi 36 (1):55-65.
Acquaintance, Parsimony, and Epiphenomenalism.Brie Gertler - 2019 - In Sam Coleman (ed.), The Knowledge Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 62-86.
The Explanatory Gap Argument and Phenomenal States: A Defense of Physicalism.Fasiku Gbenga - 2011 - Kritike 5 (2):96-111.
Enlightening the fully informed.Michael Pelczar - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):29-56.
Imagination, indexicality, and intensions. [REVIEW]David J. Chalmers - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):182-90.
The knowledge argument.Torin Alter - 1999 - A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Analysis in Mind.Andrew Botterell - 1998 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Do Conceivability Arguments against Physicalism Beg the Question?Janet Levin - 2012 - Philosophical Topics 40 (2):71-89.
Fine-grained supervenience, cognitive neuroscience, and the future of functionalism.Pete Mandik - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-16

Downloads
9 (#1,261,065)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references