Coincident Entities and Question-Begging Predicates: an Issue in Meta-Ontology

Metaphysica 14 (1):1-15 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Meta-ontology (in van Inwagen's sense) concerns the methodology of ontology, and a controversial meta-ontological issue is to what extent ontology can rely on linguistic analysis while establishing the furniture of the world. This paper discusses an argument advanced by some ontologists (I call them unifiers) against supporters of or coincident entities (I call them multipliers) and its meta-ontological import. Multipliers resort to Leibniz's Law to establish that spatiotemporally coincident entities a and b are distinct, by pointing at a predicate F () made true by a and false by b . Unifiers try to put multipliers in front of a dilemma: in attempting to introduce metaphysical differences on the basis of semantic distinctions, multipliers either (a) rest on a fallacy of verbalism, entailed by a trade-off between a de dicto and a de re reading of modal claims, or (b) beg the question against unifiers by having to assume the distinction between a and b beforehand. I shall rise a tu quoque, showing that unifiers couldn't even distinguish material objects (or events) from the spatiotemporal regions they occupy unless they also resorted to linguistic distinctions. Their methodological aim to emancipate themselves from linguistic analysis in ontological businesses is therefore problematic

Similar books and articles

Meta-Ontology.Peter van Inwagen - 1998 - Erkenntnis 48:233-250.
Meta-ontology.Peter Van Inwagen - 1998 - Erkenntnis 48 (2-3):233--50.
Meta-Ontology.Peter van Inwagen - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2:65-72.
Resolving Scheffler and Chomsky’s Problems on Quine’s Criterion of Ontological Commitments.Jolly Thomas - 2019 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 36 (2):229-245.
Easy Social Ontology.Miguel Garcia-Godinez - 2023 - In Thomasson on Ontology. Springer Verlag. pp. 183-208.
Two Defenses of Common-Sense Ontology.Uriah Kriegel - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (2):177-204.
On Whether It Is and What It Is.Francesco Franda - forthcoming - Acta Analytica:1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-01

Downloads
925 (#16,077)

6 months
140 (#27,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Franz Berto
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics.Peter F. Strawson - 1959 - London, England: Routledge. Edited by Wenfang Wang.

View all 72 references / Add more references