Bayesian and frequentist models: legitimate choices for different purposes of clinical research

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1045-1047 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01247.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A comparison of a Bayesian vs. a frequentist method for profiling hospital performance.Peter C. Austin, C. David Naylor & Jack V. Tu - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (1):35-45.
Bayeswatch: an overview of Bayesian statistics.Peter C. Austin, Lawrence J. Brunner & S. M. Janet E. Hux Md - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):277-286.
Statistics‐based research – a pig in a poke?James Penston - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):862-867.
A case for Bayesianism in clinical trials (with discussion).Donald A. Berry - 1993 - Statistics in Medicine 12 (15-16):1377-1393.
The Role of Randomization in Bayesian and Frequentist Design of Clinical Trial.Paola Berchialla, Dario Gregori & Ileana Baldi - 2019 - Topoi 38 (2):469-475.
Bayesian statistics in medical research: an intuitive alternative to conventional data analysis.Lyle C. Gurrin, Jennifer J. Kurinczuk & Paul R. Burton - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (2):193-204.
Models based on value and probability in health improve shared decision making.Monica Ortendahl - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):714-717.
Bayeswatch: an overview of Bayesian statistics.Peter C. Austin, Lawrence J. Brunner & E. Janet - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):277-286.
Bayesian clinical reasoning: does intuitive estimation of likelihood ratios on an ordinal scale outperform estimation of sensitivities and specificities?Juan Moreira, Zeno Bisoffi, Alberto Narváez & Jef Van den Ende - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):934-940.
We are All Bayesian, Everyone is Not a Bayesian.Mattia Andreoletti & Andrea Oldofredi - 2019 - Topoi 38 (2):477-485.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
26 (#598,685)

6 months
10 (#382,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Zackary Berger
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A treatise of human nature.David Hume - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Error and the growth of experimental knowledge.Deborah Mayo - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (1):455-459.
What Is Wrong With Bayes Nets?Nancy Cartwright - 2001 - The Monist 84 (2):242-264.

Add more references