The “namely” analysis of the “by”-locution

Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (1):29 - 51 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Event causation: The counterfactual analysis.Jonathan Bennett - 1987 - Philosophical Perspectives 1:367-386.
Quine’s Way Out.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1975 - Analysis 36 (1):28-37.
‘By’: A refutation of the Anscombe Thesis.Benjamin Schnieder - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (6):649 - 669.
The act itself.Jonathan Bennett - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Whatever the Consequences.Jonathan Bennett - 1966 - Analysis 26 (3):83 - 102.
Acting and Refraining.Jonathan Bennett - 1967 - Analysis 28 (1):30 - 31.
Illocution, silencing and the act of refusal.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):415-437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#292,023)

6 months
2 (#1,214,131)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

‘By’: A refutation of the Anscombe Thesis.Benjamin Schnieder - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (6):649 - 669.
Choosing your poison and the time of a killing.Auke J. K. Pols - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):719-733.
The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning.Michael Waldmann (ed.) - 2017 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Facts, events and their identity conditions.N. L. Wilson - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (5):303 - 321.

Add more references