Happy Reading!

Oxford Literary Review 44 (2):192-210 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ‘Happy Few’ of Stendhal's dedications are certainly readers, but they do not cohere into a community, and are vigilant and suspicious around the use of the first-person plural pronoun. This already sets them apart from the proponents of ‘surface reading’, who, moreover, have a historically questionable and conceptually feeble understanding of the intimate relationship between deconstruction and reading-and indeed of what thinking in terms of ‘surface’ entails.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reading Realism in Stendhal.Ann Jefferson - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Reading Pieces.Peggy Kamuf - 2022 - Oxford Literary Review 44 (2):234-250.
Reading.Florian Radvan - 2019 - In Ludger Kühnhardt & Tilman Mayer (eds.), The Bonn Handbook of Globality: Volume 1. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 277-285.
Reading as a Philosopher.David W. Concepción - 2019 - The Philosophers' Magazine 85:79-84.
Bataille’s anti-fascism.Robyn Marasco - 2022 - Contemporary Political Theory 21 (1):3-23.
Reading Derrida close reading Lemov close reading close reading.Jordan Corson - 2020 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (3):240-250.
Are there universals of reading? We don't believe so.Max Coltheart & Stephen Crain - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):282-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-01

Downloads
6 (#1,451,665)

6 months
1 (#1,479,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Geoffrey Bennington
Emory University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references