Facets and Levels of Mathematical Abstraction

Philosophia Scientiae 18:81-112 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mathematical abstraction is the process of considering and ma­nipulating operations, rules, methods and concepts divested from their refe­rence to real world phenomena and circumstances, and also deprived from the content connected to particular applications. There is no one single way of per­forming mathematical abstraction. The term “abstraction” does not name a unique procedure but a general process, which goes many ways that are mostly simultaneous and intertwined; in particular, the process does not amount only to logical subsumption. I will consider comparatively how philosophers consi­der abstraction and how mathematicians perform it, with the aim to bring to light the fundamental thinking processes at play, and to illustrate by signifi­cant examples how much intricate and multi-leveled may be the combination of typical mathematical techniques which include axiomatic method, invariance principles, equivalence relations and functional correspondences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Facets and Levels of Mathematical Abstraction.Hourya Benis Sinaceur - 2014 - Philosophia Scientiae 18 (1):81-112.
Facets and Levels of Mathematical Abstraction.Hourya Benis Sinaceur - 2014 - Philosophia Scientiae 18 (1):81-112.
The method of levels of abstraction.Luciano Floridi - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (3):303–329.
The limits of abstraction.Kit Fine - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthias Schirn.
Neologicist Nominalism.Rafal Urbaniak - 2010 - Studia Logica 96 (2):149-173.
Aristoteles’in Matematik Felsefesi ve Matematik Soyut­lama.Murat Kelikli - 2017 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):33-49.
Some Aspects of the Theory of Abstraction in Plotinus and Iamblichus.Claudia Maggi - 2015 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 9 (2):159-176.
The nature of progress in mathematics: the significance of analogy.Hourya Benis-Sinaceur - 2000 - In Emily Grosholz & Herbert Breger (eds.), The growth of mathematical knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 281--293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-23

Downloads
11 (#1,132,055)

6 months
1 (#1,461,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hourya Benis Sinaceur
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

Neurophilosophy of Number.Hourya Benis Sinaceur - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (1):1-25.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathematical truth.Paul Benacerraf - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
Structure in mathematics and logic: A categorical perspective.S. Awodey - 1996 - Philosophia Mathematica 4 (3):209-237.
Logic, Logic, and Logic.George Boolos - 2000 - History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):223-229.

View all 7 references / Add more references