Prolegomena to a theory of standards of proof : the test case for state liability for undue pre-trial detention

In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Carmen Vázquez (eds.), Evidential Legal Reasoning: Crossing Civil Law and Common Law Traditions. Cambridge University Press (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Prolegomena to a theory of standards of proof : the test case for state liability for undue pre-trial detention.Jordi Ferrer Beltrán - 2020 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Carmen Vázquez Rojas (eds.), Evidential legal reasoning: crossing civil law and common law traditions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Preventive Pre-trial Detention without Punishment.Richard L. Lippke - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):111-127.
The Comparative Advantages of Brain-Based Lie Detection: The P300 Concealed Information Test and Pre-trial Bargaining.John Danaher - 2015 - International Journal of Evidence and Proof 19 (1).
Kant’s Treatment of the Mathematical Antinomies in the First Critique and in the Prolegomena: A Comparison.Alberto Vanzo - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):505-531.
Ending Concerns About Undue Inducement.Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):100-105.
Ending Concerns about Undue Inducement.Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):100-105.
Undue inducement, or unfair exclusion: considering a case study of pregnancy in an HIV prevention trial.Bridget G. Haire & Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (12):829-830.
Answering for crime: responsibility and liability in the criminal law.Antony Duff - 2007 - Portland, Or.: Hart.
The Reasonable and the Relevant: Legal Standards of Proof.Georgi Gardiner - 2019 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 47 (3):288-318.
Kant's Prolegomena: A Critical Guide.Peter Thielke (ed.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008.Kathryn T. Mngadi, Jerome A. Singh, Leila E. Mansoor & Douglas R. Wassenaar - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (12):824-828.
A Critique of Social Products Liability.Gordon G. Sollars - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (3):381-390.
Some Prolegomena to Any Future Truth Theory in Christian Philosophy.Joshua Lee Harris - 2015 - Philosophia Christi 17 (1):71-87.
Assessment criteria or standards of proof? An effort in clarification.Giovanni Tuzet - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (1):91-109.
Transcendental idealism in the Prolegomena.Lucy Allais - 2021 - In Peter Thielke (ed.), Kant's Prolegomena: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references