Chaos and fundamentalism

Philosophy of Science 67 (3):465 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. It is natural to wonder what our multitude of successful physical theories tell us about the world—singly, and as a body. What are we to think when one theory tells us about a flat Newtonian spacetime, the next about a curved Lorentzian geometry, and we have hints of others, portraying discrete or higher-dimensional structures which look something like more familiar spacetimes in appropriate limits?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The construction of chaos theory.Yvon Gauthier - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (3):153-165.
Life, chaos, and transdisciplinarity: A personal journey.Bob Hodge - 2007 - World Futures 63 (3 & 4):209 – 222.
Has chaos been explained?Jeffrey Koperski - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):683-700.
Bohmian insights into quantum chaos.James T. Cushing - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):445.
Whither southern fundamentalism?James E. Tomberlin - 1994 - Philosophical Issues 5:249 - 256.
A Philosophical Evaluation of the Chaos Theory "Revolution".Stephen H. Kellert - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:33 - 49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
104 (#167,563)

6 months
18 (#139,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gordon Belot
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Chance and time.Amit Hagar - 2004 - Dissertation, Ubc
Naturalización de la Metafísica Modal.Carlos Romero - 2021 - Dissertation, National Autonomous University of Mexico

Add more citations

References found in this work

Explaining the emergence of cooperative phenomena.Chuang Liu - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):106.
Chaos out of order: Quantum mechanics, the correspondence principle and chaos.Gordon Belot & John Earman - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (2):147-182.
Interpretation in Science and in the Arts.Bas Van Fraassen & Jill Sigman - 1993 - In George Levine (ed.), Realism and Representation. University of Wisconsin Press.
The Philosophy of Science, An Introduction.St Toulmin - 1955 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 145:482-482.

Add more references