The Modern Intelligent Design Hypothesis

Philosophia Christi 3 (1):165-179 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/pc20013111

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The modern intelligent design hypothesis breaking rules.Michael Behe - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), Philosophia Christi. Routledge. pp. 277.
The modern intelligent design hypothesis : Breaking rules.Michael Behe - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), Philosophia Christi. Routledge. pp. 65-180.
Intelligent design is not optimal design.William Dembski - manuscript
The Pros and Cons of 'Intelligent Design'.Martin Poulsom - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (2):175-191.
Intelligent design and probability reasoning.Elliott Sober - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (2):65-80.
Breaking rules'.Michael Behc - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge. pp. 277.
Evidence for intelligent design from biochemistry.Michael Behe - 2005 - Think 4 (11):27-40.
Whose God? What science?: Reply to Michael Behe.Robert Pennock - manuscript
Intelligent Design and the End of Science.Jeffrey Koperski - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588.
Infinite universe or intelligent design?William Dembski - manuscript
Gauging intelligent design's success.William Dembski - manuscript
A Scientific and Religious Critique of Intelligent Design.Stephen Matheson - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 278--289.
Intelligent‐Design Theory: An Argument for Biotic Laws.Uko Zylstra - 2004 - Zygon 39 (1):175-191.
Steve Fuller and Intelligent Design.Jeremy Shearmur - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):433-445.
Does "Intelligent Design" Have a Chance? An Essay Review.Howard J. Van Till - 1999 - Zygon 34 (4):667-675.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
25 (#632,603)

6 months
10 (#267,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Natural Theology and Religious Belief.Max Baker-Hytch - 2023 - In John Greco, Tyler Dalton McNabb & Jonathan Fuqua (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 13-28.
How to prove the existence of God: an argument for conjoined panentheism.Elizabeth D. Burns - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (1):5-21.
The 'why design?' Question.Neil A. Manson - 2008 - In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New waves in philosophy of religion. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 68.
The “who designed the designer?” objection to design arguments.Lloyd Strickland - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):87-100.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references