The betrayal of Edom: Remarks on a claimed tradition

HTS Theological Studies 72 (4):1-4 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Biblical and post-Biblical texts refer to the tradition of the betrayal of Edom. During the conquest the brother-nation of Edom would have betrayed Judah by choosing sides with the Babylonians. Historical and archaeological evidence for this 'fact' is absent or not convincing. It is argued that the occupation of Southern Judah by the Edomites in late Babylonian and/or Persian times would have been the source of this claimed tradition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Edom and the Edomites.D. Bruce MacKay & John R. Bartlett - 1992 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 112 (3):543.
'Between Betrayal and Betrayal': Epistemology and Ethics in Derrida's Debt to Levinas.Margret Grebowicz - 2005 - In Eric Sean Nelson, Antje Kapust & Kent Still (eds.), Addressing Levinas. Northwestern University Press. pp. 75--85.
Betrayal aversion is reasonable.Jonathan J. Koehler & Andrew D. Gershoff - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):556-557.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-04

Downloads
16 (#910,507)

6 months
8 (#368,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references