Aligning Multiple Research Techniques in Cognitive Neuroscience: Why Is It Important?

Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S48-S58 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The need to align multiple experimental procedures and produce converging results so as to demonstrate that the phenomenon under investigation is real and not an artifact is a commonplace both in scientific practice and discussions of scientific methodology (Campbell and Stanley 1963; Wimsatt 1981). Although sometimes this is the purpose of aligning techniques, often there is a different purpose—multiple techniques are sought to supply different perspectives on the phenomena under investigation that need to be integrated to answer the questions scientists are asking. After introducing this function, I will illustrate it by considering three of the major techniques in cognitive neuroscience for linking cognitive function with neural structure

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroimaging.Randy L. Buckner & Steven E. Petersen - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 413–424.
Cognitive science.Paul Thagard - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
236 (#87,974)

6 months
9 (#437,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Bechtel
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Robustness and Independent Evidence.Jacob Stegenga & Tarun Menon - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (3):414-435.
The epistemology of evidence in cognitive neuroscience.William P. Bechtel - forthcoming - In Robert A. Skipper, Collin Allen, Rachel Ankeny, Carl F. Craver, Lindley Darden, Gregory Mikkelson & Robert C. Richardson (eds.), Philosophy and the Life Sciences: A Reader. MIT Press.
The Multiple Dimensions of Multiple Determination.Klodian Coko - 2020 - Perspectives on Science 28 (4):505-541.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Donald Thomas Campbell - 1966 - Chicago,: R. McNally. Edited by Julian C. Stanley & N. L. Gage.
.Michael I. Posner & Charles R. Snyder - 2004 - Psychology Press.
Multiple memory systems: What and why, an update.Lynn Nadel - 1994 - In D. Schacter & E. Tulving (eds.), Memory Systems. MIT Press. pp. 1994--39.
From imaging to believing: Epistemic issues in generating biological data.William Bechtel - 1999 - In Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Biology and epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 138--163.

View all 7 references / Add more references