Voting Rules and Coordination Problems
In Mario Augusto Bunge (ed.), The Methodological Unity of Science. Boston: Reidel. pp. 155--189 (1973)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
A characterization of majority voting rules with quorums.Nicolas Houy - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (3):295-301.
Experimental evidence of the emergence of aesthetic rules in pure coordination games.Federica Alberti - manuscript
On the stability of a triplet of scoring rules.Mostapha Diss & Vincent Merlin - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (2):289-316.
Condorcet vs. Borda in light of a dual majoritarian approach.Eyal Baharad & Shmuel Nitzan - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (2):151-162.
Decision-theoretic paradoxes as voting paradoxes.Rachael Briggs - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):1-30.
Mutual Expectations: A Conventionalist Theory of Law.Govert den Hartogh - 2002 - Kluwer Law International.
Communication compatible voting rules.Mark Thordal-Le Quement - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (4):479-507.
Intensity of preference and related uncertainty in non-compensatory aggregation rules.Giuseppe Munda - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (4):649-669.
Strategic coordination and the law.Nicholas Almendares & Dimitri Landa - 2007 - Law and Philosophy 26 (5):501-529.
Postulates and Paradoxes of Relative Voting Power - A Critical Re-Appraisal.Dan S. Felsenthal - 1995 - Theory and Decision 38 (2):195-229.
Pareto improvements by Pareto strategic voting under majority voting with risk loving and risk avoiding voters — A note.I. D. A. Macintyre - 1995 - Theory and Decision 39 (2):207-211.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-01
Downloads
10 (#890,271)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2014-02-01
Downloads
10 (#890,271)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
