This wooden table could have been made from plastic

Abstract

In defense of de re necessity, Saul Kripke proposes that a material object could not have originated in a substance different in kind from the substance in which it actually originated. I give a counterexample to this proposal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Bounds of Possibility: Puzzles of Modal Variation.Cian Dorr, John Hawthorne & Juhani Yli-Vakkuri - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Hawthorne & Juhani Yli-Vakkuri.
Kripke on necessity and identity.Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1998 - Philosophical Papers 27 (3):151-159.
Necessity of origins and multi-origin art.Joshua Spencer & Chris Tillman - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (7):741-754.
Could there have been unicorns?Marga Reimer - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1):35 – 51.
On the Non-Necessity of Origin.M. S. Price - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):33 - 45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#92,080)

6 months
60 (#259,995)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references