- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
From axiom to dialogue: a philosophical study of logics and argumentation
New York: W. de Gruyter. Edited by E. C. W. Krabbe (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The lattice of modal logics: An algebraic investigation.W. J. Blok - 1980 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (2):221-236.
On combinations of propositional dynamic logic and doxastic modal logics.Renate A. Schmidt & Dmitry Tishkovsky - 2008 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (1):109-129.
Pseudo two-valued evaluation method for intermediate logics.Tsutomu Hosoi - 1986 - Studia Logica 45 (1):3 - 8.
On regular modal logics with axiom □ ⊤ → □□ ⊤.Kazimierz Świrydowicz - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (2):171 - 174.
A universal logic approach to adaptive logics.Diderik Batens - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (1):221-242.
Argumentation and education.Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.) - 2009 - New York: Springer.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
12 (#1,085,484)
6 months
5 (#639,460)
2009-01-28
Downloads
12 (#1,085,484)
6 months
5 (#639,460)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.Peter Houtlosser & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1999 - Discourse Studies 1 (4):479-497.
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life.Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1.
Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 283-301.
Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.Eddo Rigotti & Sara Greco Morasso - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):489-512.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo