Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian GeneticsKyung-Man Kim [Book Review]

Isis 87 (1):198-199 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/357470

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics by Kyung-Man Kim. [REVIEW]Barry Barnes - 1996 - Isis 87:198-199.
Consensus in Science.Miriam Solomon - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:193-204.
Conceptual tensions between theory and program: The chromosome theory and the Mendelian research program. [REVIEW]Gerrit Balen - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (4):435-461.
Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation.Boaz Miller - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):15-33.
Hierarchy of scientific consensus and the flow of dissensus over time.Kyung-Man Kim - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (1):3-25.
Theory change in science: strategies from Mendelian genetics.Lindley Darden - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.
Maintaining Continuity through a Scientific Revolution. [REVIEW]Sharon Kingsland - 2007 - Isis 98 (3):468-488.
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement.Boaz Miller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1293-1316.
Why the antireductionist consensus won't survive the case of classical Mendelian genetics.C. Kenneth Waters - 1990 - Philosophy of Science Association 1:125-39.
Three Criteria for Consensus Conferences.Jacob Stegenga - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):35-49.
Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony.Elizabeth Anderson - 2011 - Episteme 8 (2):144-164.
The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric—Mendelian Debate.Robert Olby - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (3):299-320.
The failure of a scientific critique: David Heron, Karl Pearson and Mendelian eugenics.Hamish G. Spencer & Diane B. Paul - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Science 31 (4):441-452.
Towards Democratic Models of Science: Exploring the Case of Scientific Pluralism.Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (2):149-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
26 (#609,328)

6 months
8 (#356,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Beyond Mendelism and Biometry.Yafeng Shan - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):155-163.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references